
Working on.
HARRIMANSAT
Maybe it's meant to be helmet-mounted. :)EMS wrote:![]()
Hard to say from the picture. Me thinks I would like to have a little more resolution. Seems like you will have a hard time seeing minor differences.
Number four can't be adjusted. It is the reference to which all other carbs must be adjusted. Or did I misunderstand your question?barryadam wrote:harrimansat, ...
I am curious to see if the adjustment to #4 brings the vacuum to near-zero at the 240 crank position.
Barry
I neglected to consider which one was non-adjustable.spencer wrote:Number four can't be adjusted. It is the reference to which all other carbs must be adjusted. Or did I misunderstand your question?
Yes, a guy on ADV did a similar thing - designed and built a run of digital synchronizers for twins, then set out to to it again for 4-cylinder bikes. He sold as many of the twins unit as he had the stamina to make before he packed it up in May. It is said that he will resume at some point.spencer wrote:It is hard to tell, but if you look carefully at the color code on the right side of that plot, the low one is number three. Number four is the first one on the left. This is confirmed by the gauge display, which shows number four is highest, and number three is lowest.
We are not getting a lot of information about this instrument yet, but I think it must be a one of a kind piece. A prototype, if you will. The interesting thing will be to see if it can be produced at an affordable price. The possibilities of what could be done with this technology are very interesting.
In the test, cylinder 3 is conected throught a T hose adaptor to pedcock valve, in the next test, I will connect cylinder 4 directly to the vacuum sincronizer to see what happens.barryadam wrote:harrimansat,
Do you have another plot done after the adjustments?
I am curious to see if the adjustment to #4 brings the vacuum to near-zero at the 240 crank position.
Barry