.....The reasoning behind larger IN. valves is that it creates more area for the incoming
charge to collect before the valve opens. The sooner more fuel/air enters the cyl.,
the more complete the cyl. filling is. Consider that the IN. flow is the opposite direction
of the EXH. flow and that the EXH gasses don't need more area to collect before exiting
the combustion chamber and the question is why have a larger EXH valve ? It would seem
that the larger valve would be an obstacle to EXH flow. Ideally you want the least obstruction
to EXH flow to get the heat out of the cyl. as quickly as possible. With a larger EXH valve
the gases have to go farther around the valve to enter the port restricting flow.
This could be one of the reasons behind the CR750 EXH valves being smaller than the stock
CB750(SOHC) valves. In a way it seems contradictory to the increased backpressure idea but
speeding up the EXH flow at the valve seat into a smaller dia. header tube would make sense.
(maybe). These are the speculations of a bedbound mechanic with too much time to think.
When/if I get the chance to build my project motor (1150) I intend to use CB1100F IN. valves
and the stock CBX EXH valves.