Late Model (81/82) Rear Shock

Larry Zimmer
ICOA Web Post/Pix/Video Archive Mgt
ICOA Web Post/Pix/Video Archive Mgt
Posts: 2205
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 2:32 pm
Location: Brighton, MI
Location: Brighton, Mich
Contact:

Late Model (81/82) Rear Shock

Post by Larry Zimmer »

Just a heads-up for anyone interested: Progressive Suspension rear shock 465-1115 currently listed on Amazon at $370. Includes shipping. Says 13 remaining in stock.
Larry Zimmer
cbxlarry@sbcglobal.net

daves79x
ICOA Technical Director
ICOA Technical Director
Posts: 4751
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:05 am
Location: Knox, PA
Location: Knox, PA

Re: Late Model (81/82) Rear Shock

Post by daves79x »

You guys running the stock shock on late models - I'd be jumping all over that. The stock shock is poor and always has been. You won't believe its the same bike with a new shock. Best money you'll ever spend on suspension.

Dave

steve murdoch icoa #5322
ICOA Member
ICOA Member
Posts: 4074
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2003 9:12 am
Location: St. Catharines, On. Canada
Location: St. Catharines, On. Canada

Re: Late Model (81/82) Rear Shock

Post by steve murdoch icoa #5322 »

Thanks for the heads-up on the shock, Larry.
In looking at the Amazon page the have 2 versions for sale.
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss? ... suspension
The 465-1115 on sale for $370
The 465 on sale for $429.
Seems the only difference is a remote preload adjuster on the more expensive model?
On the Progressive site the 465 refers to the whole series.
Anybody currently using one of these?

Larry Zimmer
ICOA Web Post/Pix/Video Archive Mgt
ICOA Web Post/Pix/Video Archive Mgt
Posts: 2205
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 2:32 pm
Location: Brighton, MI
Location: Brighton, Mich
Contact:

Re: Late Model (81/82) Rear Shock

Post by Larry Zimmer »

Thanks for including the website for folks, Steve. (A little slow, here! DUH!!) I haven't used one, yet. However, I do have one in-shipping as I speak. The $370 -1115 model. Given that I ride solo 99+% of the time, it will be set-it-and-forget-it for me. Won't be riding, though, until next Spring to give a performance report. Although, we can, certainly, take Dave's word for it.
Larry Zimmer
cbxlarry@sbcglobal.net

Larry Zimmer
ICOA Web Post/Pix/Video Archive Mgt
ICOA Web Post/Pix/Video Archive Mgt
Posts: 2205
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 2:32 pm
Location: Brighton, MI
Location: Brighton, Mich
Contact:

Re: Late Model (81/82) Rear Shock

Post by Larry Zimmer »

Steve (and all), FYI: regarding the Progressive Suspension 465 shock for the '81/'82, the remote preload adjuster of the $429 shock still requires manually setting a 'course' adjustment with lock rings, same as the $370 shock. The remote adjuster is a 'tweeker'. How much tweek, I don't know. (I decided to go with the $370 manual shock.) In lieu of any feedback from any Forum member who might know, the Tech support phone at Progressive is 714.523.8700.
Larry Zimmer
cbxlarry@sbcglobal.net

Rockosmith
ICOA Member
ICOA Member
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 9:47 pm
Location: Starkville, MS US
Location: Starkville, MS US

Re: Late Model (81/82) Rear Shock

Post by Rockosmith »

I just replaced the stock rear shock on my '82 Prolink with the Progressive shock. Very happy with the results. My question is how to keep the red low pressure light off since obviously there is no longer any pressure. Remove the bulb or can you simply jumper the wire that went to the pressure switch to ground?

Larry Zimmer
ICOA Web Post/Pix/Video Archive Mgt
ICOA Web Post/Pix/Video Archive Mgt
Posts: 2205
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 2:32 pm
Location: Brighton, MI
Location: Brighton, Mich
Contact:

Re: Late Model (81/82) Rear Shock

Post by Larry Zimmer »

Rocko, Just ground the wire that goes to the switch. Glad to hear you got the chassis improvement, too.
Larry Zimmer
cbxlarry@sbcglobal.net

Rockosmith
ICOA Member
ICOA Member
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 9:47 pm
Location: Starkville, MS US
Location: Starkville, MS US

Re: Late Model (81/82) Rear Shock

Post by Rockosmith »

Thanks Larry. That is what I thought, just wanted to make sure.

User avatar
Mike Nixon
ICOA Member
ICOA Member
Posts: 378
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 10:52 pm
Location: Prescott, AS
Location: Prescott, AZ
Contact:

Re: Late Model (81/82) Rear Shock

Post by Mike Nixon »

Hi, gang! I hope you'll permit this minor highjack. FYI I have a few seals for refurbing the stock shock, and more coming. As you know, the factory seals ran out some little time ago. I agree with all comments re the stock shock not being the best. See my articles on refurbing the stock shock. However, for those interested, I invite inquiries for shock reseals.

http://www.motorcycleproject.com/text/8 ... per_v3.swf
http://www.motorcycleproject.com/text/shock_short.html

Larry Zimmer
ICOA Web Post/Pix/Video Archive Mgt
ICOA Web Post/Pix/Video Archive Mgt
Posts: 2205
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 2:32 pm
Location: Brighton, MI
Location: Brighton, Mich
Contact:

Re: Late Model (81/82) Rear Shock

Post by Larry Zimmer »

That's a 'fair' hi-jack, Mike. Thanks. As always, many thanks for all your advice and service to the cause CBX.
Larry Zimmer
cbxlarry@sbcglobal.net

User avatar
Mike Nixon
ICOA Member
ICOA Member
Posts: 378
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 10:52 pm
Location: Prescott, AS
Location: Prescott, AZ
Contact:

Re: Late Model (81/82) Rear Shock

Post by Mike Nixon »

:-)

User avatar
Mike Nixon
ICOA Member
ICOA Member
Posts: 378
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 10:52 pm
Location: Prescott, AS
Location: Prescott, AZ
Contact:

Re: Late Model (81/82) Rear Shock

Post by Mike Nixon »

Please, a heads up. Elsewhere I noticed someone is recommending that way over the stock pressure be run in the CBX Pro-Link shock. Don't. I understand about it improving handling, but by putting much more than the factory maximum 57 psi you will -- not maybe, will -- destroy the shock. The extra pressure causes the seal to grip the large chromed body so tightly it wears the chrome off and results in a trashed, leaky shock. This is a well known issue among Honda techs. When I replace seals on these shocks I shim the spring slightly so you get the same benefit without having to over-pressurize the shock. A word to the wise, as they say.

hondaman160mph
ICOA Member
ICOA Member
Posts: 304
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 12:27 pm
Location: Elk River Minnesota
Location: Elk River Minnesota

Re: Late Model (81/82) Rear Shock

Post by hondaman160mph »

I would check with Progressive before ordering the remote adjustable shock from Amazon.From what I see on Progressive's web site the
N465-115 does not have a remote adjuster. May be an error in Amazon's description.

User avatar
SteveG
ICOA Member
ICOA Member
Posts: 589
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 8:16 pm
Location: Skaneateles, NY
Location: Skaneateles, NY

Re: Late Model (81/82) Rear Shock

Post by SteveG »

I ordered and just received a Progressive 465-1115 shock from http://www.jcmotors.com for a super price deal. The shock was $367.81, and if you enter the code "NEWCUST0122" at checkout, you get 10% off. Do the math.

I also ordered (and are intransit as I type) new Progressive springs (11-1112) for the forks which are $69 before the 10% off. I can't wait for clear roads!!!

Oh, free shipping too!!

Steve
82 CBX, 82 CB900F Project, 81 CB900(985)F, 79 CB750(810)F, 06 Wee-Strom

Larry Zimmer
ICOA Web Post/Pix/Video Archive Mgt
ICOA Web Post/Pix/Video Archive Mgt
Posts: 2205
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 2:32 pm
Location: Brighton, MI
Location: Brighton, Mich
Contact:

Re: Late Model (81/82) Rear Shock

Post by Larry Zimmer »

Steve,

You may need to add a preload sleeve to the forks with those springs. No problem. Use some PVC pipe and a couple large appropriate size flat washers. Use something to cut the pvc square. Have fun. You'll enjoy.
Larry Zimmer
cbxlarry@sbcglobal.net

Post Reply

Return to “HANDLING: Suspension, Gearing, Frame Bracing, Non X Handling Part Upgrades, Rim Replacement Options, and more”